Big Bamboo
Big Bamboo — RTP 96.13%, Volatility High, Lines 50
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- High
- Lines
- 50
- Bamboo
- Push Gaming
Pokie guide · Australia
Fire in the Hole 2 is a high-volatility pokie with no published RTP or volatility figures we could verify. This page explains what that means for a deposit, and how the partner's bonus terms apply in practice.
These five pokies are ranked by published RTP, highest to lowest, and the figures below are the ones we can verify.
Checked on 19 October 2026
Big Bamboo — RTP 96.13%, Volatility High, Lines 50
Starburst — RTP 96.08%, Max win 800x, Lines 10
Wolf Gold — RTP 96.01%, Volatility Medium, Max win 5,000x, Lines 25
Queen of the Nile — RTP 95.98%, Volatility Medium, Max win 800x, Lines 20
Pompeii — RTP 95.96%, Volatility Medium, Max win 1,500x, Lines 243
Sort by whichever figure decides it for you.
| 1Big Bamboo | 96.13% | High | — | Push Gaming |
| 2Starburst | 96.08% | — | 800x | NetEnt |
| 3Wolf Gold | 96.01% | Medium | 5,000x | Pragmatic Play |
| 4Queen of the Nile | 95.98% | Medium | 800x | Aristocrat |
| 5Pompeii | 95.96% | Medium | 1,500x | Aristocrat |
Select a column heading to sort.
We could not find published RTP or volatility figures for Fire in the Hole 2 that we are willing to stand behind. That is not a criticism of the game or its developer, only a statement about what is publicly available. If a page shows you a precise return percentage for this pokie and cannot point to where it comes from, treat that number as decoration rather than information.
What we can say is that pokies in this style are typically sold to players as high-volatility entertainment, and that matters more than any single figure. High volatility means most sessions return nothing meaningful and a small number of spins return a lot. The published return figure, where one exists, is a long-run average across millions of spins, not a forecast for your session.
A deposit on a high-volatility pokie buys spins, not a bonus round. The bonus is an event inside the game, not a product you are owed because you paid in. Players who treat the deposit as the price of admission to a feature are the ones who keep topping up after the balance runs down, and that is the expensive mistake this site was built to talk about.
There is no strategy that forces a bonus round to arrive earlier, and no stake pattern that improves the return on a spin. The only honest framing is that you are paying for a period of play with a known long-run average and an unknown short-run result. If the session ends before the feature appears, that is a normal outcome, not a malfunction.
The partner's published terms change the arithmetic of a deposit. First deposit: 600% cash bonus; daily cashback: 10% of losses; minimum deposit: US$20; maximum bet on a bonus: A$5. The cashback is on losses, so it softens a bad day rather than rewarding one, and the bonus credit is not the same thing as cash you can withdraw on demand.
The A$5 cap on a bonus is the term that quietly reshapes play. If your normal stake is above it, accepting the bonus means either reducing your stake or breaking the rule. Always read the full terms in the cashier before you deposit, because the version on this page is a summary of published terms and may not reflect every condition attached to your account.
We could not verify a published RTP figure for Fire in the Hole 2, so we do not print one. RTP is a long-run average across a very large number of spins and does not describe what a single session will return.
Games in this style are generally described as high volatility, which means long dry spells and occasional large returns. We have no verified volatility figure for this title, so treat the label as a general expectation rather than a measurement.
The partner publishes a 600% cash bonus on the first deposit and a maximum bet on a bonus of A$5. Check the cashier terms for which games qualify, because eligibility varies and the summary here is not the full agreement.
No. There is no stake pattern, spin timing or strategy that changes when a bonus round appears, and any page claiming otherwise is selling something. A return figure is a long-run average, and a session is not.